This is so I can shoot on the move, hence why I picked steppe eagle and tide originally as these weapons have one of their stats maxed (the handling). All my weapons were upgraded with the following priority Handling > Accuracy > Recoil > Flatness > Rate of fire. I use knife, steppe eagle, and very rarely I would switch to the Tide. When you are done, there are some mods you can download to extend the life of the games.Įdit: What armor and guns do you guys favor? I am currently using the militarized scientist suit, P220 and G36 w/scope Expect to get a good 20 hours of gameplay out of each. If I were you though, I'd play them in the order they were released. In each game you get attached to that character a little bit, and then in the other games in the series you play different characters, so it lacks some continuity. Notably what bums me out about the sequels is that in each one you play a different character.
It has the most advanced gameplay interface and mechanics, and some of the most impressive graphics and immersive battles, but IMHO the story line is less satisfying. There is also a faction system which led to some of the critique when it first came out, but I wasn't bothered by it.Ĭall of Pripyat occurs after the events in Shadow of Chernobyl. This includes weapon customization and the ability to repair weapons, not just replace them as in the first game. It is a prequel to the story line in the first game, but makes the most sense if you play the first game first.Ĭlear sky also has a better developed interface as was fully intended in the first game. That being said it has the best story and is the easiest to get lost in.Ĭlear Sky got a lot of shit when it first came out, but I enjoyed it. Shadow of Chernobyl has the least well developed gameplay and UI as many intended features were absent due to project delays and hitting a hard launch date.
0 kommentar(er)
